| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
deb Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:17 pm Post subject: GS-2 Verbal Reasoning Question 24 |
|
|
FOR the following question,
24. According to the passage, the success of a colonizer in a colony CANNOT be attributed to:
I. the colonizer's adventurous nature.
II. the colonizer's ability to grasp local customs and languages.
III. the level of education of the colonizer
where in the passage does it support III?
merci. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2168
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
P2: "You go to a colony because jobs are guaranteed, wages high, careers more rapid and business more profitable. The young graduate is offered a position" suggests that whatever a person was able to get in their home country, they get even more in a colony. Thus the "young graduate" gets more success in the colony than they would get at home.
Last edited by admin on Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2168
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it would be easier for you to understand if you consider an example. In the passage it discusses (P3) Europeans and their colonies. For example, an Englishmen going to an African or Asian colony. Now they may go there because that particular colony may speak English, but clearly wherever they go, English would not be the local language. In fact, they would have chosen that particular country so they could avoid learning local customs and languages since they could get away with using their own language. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The answer says that the success of a colonizer in a colony CAN be attributed to the "level of the education of the colonizer." While P2 does mention the "young graduate" obtaining more success in the colonies than at home, it does not say that his success is due to his level of education. In fact, P2 also mentions other groups that also have success in the colonies - the "public servant," "the businessman," "the industrialist," - all of whom may have different levels of education. Given that, why can the success of a colonizer be attributed to his level of education? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acebshaw2450
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | The answer says that the success of a colonizer in a colony CAN be attributed to the "level of the education of the colonizer." While P2 does mention the "young graduate" obtaining more success in the colonies than at home, it does not say that his success is due to his level of education. In fact, P2 also mentions other groups that also have success in the colonies - the "public servant," "the businessman," "the industrialist," - all of whom may have different levels of education. Given that, why can the success of a colonizer be attributed to his level of education? |
Amen, terrible question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanne7524
Joined: 28 Jul 2010 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| acebshaw2450 wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | | The answer says that the success of a colonizer in a colony CAN be attributed to the "level of the education of the colonizer." While P2 does mention the "young graduate" obtaining more success in the colonies than at home, it does not say that his success is due to his level of education. In fact, P2 also mentions other groups that also have success in the colonies - the "public servant," "the businessman," "the industrialist," - all of whom may have different levels of education. Given that, why can the success of a colonizer be attributed to his level of education? |
Amen, terrible question |
Hi! Of course, there are other factors that contribute to the success of the colonizer, and his level of education is one of them. In order to answer this question effectively, you have to review and understand the question stem. It simply asks which of the following factors (among the many and not just one) CANNOT be attributed in the same manner that other factors (again, in plural) CAN be attributed to the colonizer's success. Hope this enlightens.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|