MCAT


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GS-1 Physical Sciences Question 22

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mcat-prep.com Forum Index -> GS-1 Physical Sciences
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
student
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:04 pm    Post subject: GS-1 Physical Sciences Question 22 Reply with quote

it asked: Ca(OH)2 has approximately the same Ksp as CaSO4. Which of them has the greater solubility in terms of mol L-1?

Why is the answer Ca(OH)2? I said CaSO4 because there are less particles dissolved, so therefore each "s" has more concentration that is dissolved (since both have the same ksp).

Doesn't having a higher concentration of "s" imply a higher solubility?
Back to top
student
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:08 pm    Post subject: ^ Reply with quote

sorry I think i explained #22 quite bad

for instance if ksp was 2

for Ca(OH)^2

(x)(2x)^2 = 2
x = 0.79

for CaSO4

x^2 = 1.41

so wouldnt CaSO4 be more soluble?
Back to top
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 2168

PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are right and wrong. Your logic is exactly right, but the math is the problem.

The key is that Ksp is always a very, very low number. The solubility product usually has an exponent which is negative alot! For example, 10 to the minus 8 to minus 60 would be quite normal.

Now try to work out your example but instead of a Ksp of 2, try 10 to the power of minus 2. You will see that because it is a fraction, you will get the opposite answer.

Keep up the good work!


Last edited by admin on Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:13 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 2168

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, let's work it out:

Given that Ksp = 10e-1

(i) solubility s = sq rt Ksp = 0.32

(ii) s = cube root of (1/4 x Ksp) = cube root of (25 x 10e-3) = 0.29

You would seem to have a point but Ksp's are very very low numbers. And the example above is not representative.

Let's say Ksp = 10e-28

(i) s = 10e-14

(ii) s = cube root of (25 x 10e-30) = 2.9 x 10e-10

Thus the solubility is higher for (ii).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mcat_premed3832



Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 428

PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you do not wish to accept the argument that Ksp's tend to be numbers that are incredibly small (in fact, common examples of Ksp range from 10 to the MINUS 25 to 60) then I'm out of explanations. But there is no doubt that the question and answer as written are correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blechz2803



Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there...I just did this test, and got the questions wrong. Can you explain this to me?
Why in the world would it matter how small the ksp is or not? and isn't the ksp usually about 10-7 area, not 10-60??
Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mcat_premed3832



Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 428

PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's OK, let's take a number from the neighborhood you mentioned: Ksp = 10^-8 (easier to work with than 10^-7)

(i) solubility s = sq rt Ksp = 10^-4

(ii) s = cube root of (1/4 x Ksp) = cube root of (0.25 x 10^-8 ) = cube root of (2.5 x 10^-9) = 1.4 x 10^-3

Thus the solubility is higher for (ii).


{NB: the step creating the exponent "10^-9" was done so a cube root can be taken without a calculator; cube root of 2.5 can simply be estimated as a number above 1 and then there is only one answer; the math is such that it has to be a small number, similar to real Ksp's; otherwise for large numbers, the opposite would be true}
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ozairmh8911



Joined: 22 May 2010
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why is Ksp not dependent on temperature? Doesn't the solubility change with temperature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jellywing_2058



Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 177

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Temperature is not relevant to this question. You can determine the answer by the fact that Ca(OH)2 gives 3 ions while CaSO4 gives only 2 ions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hua8986059



Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got this right thinking along the range of Jellywing_2058, 3 ions = more soluble. Don't need to do the cubic root etc. But now I know how to do that too based on this thread lol..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shanabona7368



Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atrivedi3827 wrote:
This question is absurd. There is no way you can justify this equation using a REALLY REALLY small number, given in your explanation ANY number less than 1 should work for Ksp and satisfy the fact that s will be greater for CaSO4. The answer is CaSO4.


The table gives you the actual Ksp, you don't have to make any inferences. If you use the value 0.13e-3 you will see that the value of s(ii) is greater than s(i) when you plug it in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mcat-prep.com Forum Index -> GS-1 Physical Sciences All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO