| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wallstng1442
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: Question 21 |
|
|
| The question has to do with obtaining a female with hemophilia in the 2nd generation. Doesn't this mean 2nd filial generation? Because it seems like the answer talks about the 1st generation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Just saying "generation" as opposed to "filial generation" is not the same. As you know, "filial" is an adjective meaning "of or relating to a generation or the sequence of generations following the parental generation." Thus if the adjective "filial" is used then the 1st filial generation is actually the 2nd generation in a family tree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bump |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stoneprod7112
Joined: 12 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:56 pm Post subject: figure one is decieving |
|
|
| I origingally had this right but then looking at figure one it shows that in the second generation a female has hemophilia or there is a dark circle. So therefore I assumed the mother must have been hetero for the disease and therefore a %25 chance. If there is a zero chance then why is there a figure showing a female with the disease in the second generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellywing_2058
Joined: 04 May 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You are looking at the third generation. Read the two previous posts about labeling generations. The second generation does not have any affected women. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calena7178147
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this Punnet square can help you understand better: The arrow is pointing to what they refer to as the “second generation” or also called the F1 generation (original parents are the F0, or generation zero). The generation with the affected female would be the third generation.
Thus, the second generation has no chance of a female with the disease. The third generation has a female with the disease. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
klr861276
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| POORLY WORDED QUESTION. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmondwahe1356
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| very poorly worded question, agreed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sleepyzboy2302
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| when it says generation, don't you just think that it was referring to F2 generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
addiaz2714087
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i second the poor wording. The generation being asked for should be specified more clearly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calena7178147
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The question is testing your genetic vocabulary and the ability to differentiate between filial generation and generation. The questions are meant to be challenging and test your understanding of biological vocabulary at the same time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|