| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kristinadi7224
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: CBT-4 in PS section #47 |
|
|
| I am trying to figure out the solution of the problem, but i do not understand the math. Why are they multiplying 1.8x 10^-5 and X to get 16x10^-6? I understand the solution up until we plug in Ka from Table one to calculate the concentration of protons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcat_premed3832
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I created line spaces in that part of the explanation that should make the calculation more clear for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dnpgr16513
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why can't we use pKa=-log (Ka)? And then use pKa=pH? Am I confusing these concepts?
thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellywing_2058
Joined: 04 May 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
YES, you are confusing weak acid solutions with buffer solution calculations!
The explanation shown in the exam is called the ICE method (or IRF Table). It is used to calculate the [H+] of a weak acid, which is then used to calculate the pH using pH = -log [H+].
We cannot use pKa = -log Ka because this will NOT give the pH. Moreover pKa does NOT equal pH. This only happens in buffers when the conjugate base concentration equals the acid concentration.
In this case, what is calculated is the pH value of a weak acid, and not of a buffer solution, which would be a solution made up of a weak acid and its salt (or conjugate base). You cannot say for weak acids alone that pKa = pH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|