| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eo5 Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject: Question 19 |
|
|
| Should the answer be B instead of D? Wouldn't Cl- move from Y to X due to chemical gradient? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't forget: in the instructions of every MCAT, it always says "choose the best answer to the question".
It is true that Cl- ions will diffuse from Y to X. But that is a very incomplete answer compared to D.
The truth is some Cl- ions will diffuse from X to Y. It is less likely for ions to diffuse against a chemical gradient BUT that is the nature of a dynamic equilibrium. Just think of all the chemical reactions that you have written where there were double sided arrows indicating that though you may be looking at the forward reaction, nonetheless both directions are possible.
And there is another element altogether: the electric gradient will have an important impact on the movement of an ion (Cl-). If it were the case that the membrane potential was initially neutral, then the second one Cl- ion crossed over to X then the X side would be net negative meaning there would be a gradient to go from X to Y for any anion (Cl-).
This is why D is definitely the best answer choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam.philbr2063
Joined: 18 Jul 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry but I don't see how that makes sense. Since we know from the passage that net ion concentrations are balanced we know that no electrochemical gradient exists.
Suppose that Y is supposed to diffuse to X to balance the chemical gradient, it in turn creates an electrochemical gradient allowing some Cl(-) from X to flow back to Y.
Now --> IF enough Cl flows back to Y so that the electrochemical gradient goes to zero (no longer exists) then we have the exact situation we started with, i.e. a chemical gradient stimulating the movement of Cl from Y to X. Therefore we KNOW that when an electrochemical gradient ceases to exist that there MUST be be a chemical gradient and ion flow will not "stop."
The only option left is that a net amount of Cl ions do in fact flow from Y to X until the equilibrium point where the electrochemical gradient pushing an excess of anions (Cl) from X to Y is equal to the chemical gradient that wants to push an excess of Cl ions from Y to X.
D is an impossible answer since it suggests that ions will move spontaneously at the beginning of the scenario, but will then return to their original position and no longer move spontaneously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellywing_2058
Joined: 04 May 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are correct about the following:
| Quote: | Since we know from the passage that net ion concentrations are balanced we know that no electrical gradient exists.
Suppose that Y is supposed to diffuse to X to balance the chemical gradient (Y Cl- > X Cl-), it in turn creates an electrochemical gradient allowing some Cl(-) from X to flow back to Y. |
Answer D is correct because it does not say that the Cl- ions are going to completely stop; it says the NET movement will stop, meaning that there will no longer be more Cl- ions going from Y to X, but the same amount of ions going from one side to the other, creating an equilibrium. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
quadalpha
Joined: 21 Feb 2010 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| B gives the important information about net direction of ion movement; D is a generic statement ("ions move; no net movement without electrochemical gradient") with no particular relevance to the situation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calena7178147
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This answer although “generic” is the best answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dnpgr16513
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I understand the answer, however does the protein concentration have no affect with the gradient? I assumed that side X had a more negative charge so K ions would move to the X side. I know this wasn't in the answers but do we not take this into consideration?
thanks so much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calena7178147
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The protein does not cross the membrane, but prevents diffusion of cations and favors diffusion of anions (Donnan effect). Therefore, assume K is not moving. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dwstar183700
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I understand why D is the correct answer, since it is the generic movement of ions, however, I don't understand why B and not C would make sense. Since there is both Cl- and Prot- on X, shouldn't the Cl- be moving from X to Y, since there is a higher concentration in X, therefore Cl- would move from a higher concentration (X) to lower concentration (Y).
Am I not getting this concept right?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hua8986059
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no wonder these questions only 2% or less ppl get right lol.. I thought I knew electrochemical gradients well until I got owned on these 2x questions. I mean if I took time to think it through maybe but spending 5 min each on these questions would not be beneficial to my overall score...
got to learn to think quicker.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|