| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sleepyzboy2302
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How did you relate the wavelength of red light to L? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcat_premed3832
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 428
|
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The truth is, had we not said anything, you would have already assumed that the movement of light (the laser) can be approximated by straight lines. Nonetheless, we just wanted to give the proof as to why that approximation is valid. It is valid because the wavelength of the red light (laser, 632 nM; recalling the very first sentence of the passage saying that it is red) is far less than the distance L (>10 m). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Inkoate Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought since Y1 was greater than Y2, theta 2 would be larger than theta 3. Also, I never knew that the wavelength and the length to the screen had anything to do with theta. I thought that wavelength and height of the slit opening affected the spreading of light. I didn't think length did also. Is there some formula we were supposed to know to answer this question? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|