| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
h99h20baby
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:13 pm Post subject: Question 29 |
|
|
I understand that the image is positive bc it is a real image. That makes since that -i/o = -M.
I do not understand how the second part plays out. If the object distance is 3x's bigger to the objective than the Fo the -i/o is less than one. Why is that? Does it have anything to do with the equation:
1/f = 1/o + 1/i??
Is it bc since the 1/f is smaller than 1/o the 1/i has to be smaller to balance the equation out? The image was positive? I am very confused.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is one of the rules of lenses (PHY 11.5): for a converging lens, the image formed depends on the object distance relative to the focal length f.
If o < f then the image is virtual and erect
If o > f then the image is real and inverted
If o = f then no image is formed.
These are the rules. If you want, you can confirm that i < o using the lens equation. Just replace o with 3f. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
h99h20baby
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you know it converging bc it is a convex lens? I thought convex was diverging? Or is that for mirrors?
regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Convex is converging for lenses, diverging for mirrors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
farshar6436
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. With regards to a diverging lens, would the image always be virtual, inverted or could you have a real image (ever) with a diverging lens?
Would the rule for convex lenses also apply to concave mirrors?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alistar2005814
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
how do you know the size of the image?
is it true that in convex lenses as you move away from the lens your image gets smaller and move closer your image gets enlarged.. is it true for all?
please explain how you can figure out the size without numbers!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alistar2005814
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
how do you know the size of the image?
is it true that in convex lenses as you move away from the lens your image gets smaller and move closer your image gets enlarged.. is it true for all?
please explain how you can figure out the size without numbers!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcat_premed3832
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 413
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bump. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hua8986059
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good to be able to toss out 2x answers with erect right away because
Real image always inverted positive
Virtual image always upright Negative
RIP VUN
Thing that got me is not reading the question clearly where it said the image by the objective. I was doing this fast and thought that the eyepiece would magnify the image..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|