| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jgeng03
Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:13 am Post subject: Question 8 |
|
|
| How can the the acceleration of m2 be different from g because there is a rope between them. I think the force diagram should look be m2g = T + m1a. T = m1a and therefore m2g = 2m1a. a = (m2g)/(2m1a) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
The equations that you wrote don't work for many reasons. Instead of looking at that, let's discuss how to come up with the relevant equations.
To begin with, let's examine m2 and all the forces that it feels. m2 experiences a tension T from the cord. m2 experiences no friction and no gravity relevant to the problem*.
Thus we get:
Newton's 2nd Law - Sum F's = ma
T = m2a2
Now we examine mass m3. It experiences the tension upwards and its weight down.
Sum of F's = m3a2
m3g - T = m3a3 = 0 (taking down as +ve and following the passage which states that m3 neither rises nor falls)
Thus T = m3g
We equate both equations and get:
m3g = m2a2
a2 = (m3/m2) g
* The gravity that m2 experiences is through the y direction only, in other words, its weight m2g. Of course there will be a force normal upwards. Clearly m2 cannot accelerate in the y direction so we get:
Sum F's = m2a = 0
N - m2g = 0
N = m2g which is not relevant to this problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maxsati7049
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Is there any acceleration in x direction for m3 ? giving the fact that the entire system is subjected to the same horizontal F force? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bump. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|