| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
h99h20baby
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:39 pm Post subject: GS-2 Physical Sciences Question 19 |
|
|
I thought that with respect to B emissions they were that you subtracted one frm the bottom atomic number...why is it adding for those Beta emissions?
Basically I feel that sometimes I have to subtract 1 and sometimes I feel I am essentially adding one....where am I going wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2169
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I thought that with respect to B emissions they were that you subtracted one frm the bottom atomic number...why is it adding for those Beta emissions? |
You were right to begin with. It is not adding for beta decay, it is subtracting 1 (or, as the Explanation to this problem demonstrates, it is the same as adding -1).
You never add +1 for beta decay unless it is the decay of a positron which has never been asked on a real MCAT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
obert823775
Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:28 pm Post subject: #19 |
|
|
| So, we should assume that the phrase "beta decay" refers to the emission of an electron (-beta)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kim.dangal6935
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: Correct # Neutrons? |
|
|
Could this problem be also solved by process of elimination regarding the loss of neutrons due to B emissions?
the neutron count went from 136 total to 134.
Only answer D had 134 neutrons total. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellywing_2058
Joined: 04 May 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mass and Energy are Equivalent according to E = m c^2.
Thus, mass can be converted to energy and energy to mass, so it is in reality and completely, “The Conservation of Mass – Energy” and not just “Conservation of Energy’ or “Conservation of Mass”.
In this question The Initial Energy is that of the moving neutron, which is kinetic in nature.
After the collision, the result is a Nuclear Transmutation, a more massive nucleus of Np being the product.
The Mass – Energy change that has taken place is Energy (moving neutron) to Mass (a greater mass Np) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jawrigh1
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What am I doing wrong I keep getting 84 protons?
We start with 238U, there are 3 alpha decays, 2 betas, and 3 gamma(which I know doesn't change anything). I can't get simple problems like this wrong. Please help me see what I'm doing wrong. I'm doing it just like the Dr. F says in the video. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbolak4784
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
you start with 238 U 92
-4 U -2
234 U 90
-4 x -2
230 U 88
-4 x -2
226 x 86
-0 x +1 +beta particle
226 x 87
-0 x +1 +Beta particle
226 Ra 88
I was getting it wrong at first also then i just wrote it out and got the answer quickly by doing it that way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jawrigh1
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought that beta emissions was 0, -1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
james.adam3659
Joined: 21 May 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Isn't beta decay where an electron and an antineutrino are emitted while a neutron is converted to a proton? Thus, for 2 beta decays, you would add 2 to the atomic number, right?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|