| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sharra.26428
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: GS-2 Physical Sciences Question 3 |
|
|
Could you please explain question number 3 because I am having trouble understanding what the question is asking and so the answer is not making sense to me either.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JoonSKim1557
Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, this question made me pretty upset.
This question hasn't mentioned that the the image is virtual. How am I suppose to make an assumption that the image formed by the eyepiece would be on the same side as the image formed by the objective? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tjk447963
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The link posted above doesn't seem to work. Can you re-post the explanation as I am having trouble understanding why the image magnification gets smaller as the objective distance decreases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sleepyzboy2302
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the explanation is confusing.. can anyone explain it a little better? thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellywing_2058
Joined: 04 May 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Object distance for the Objective = u
Image distance for the Objective = v
Magnification for the Objective = Mo = - v/u
If the distance between the Objective and the Eyepiece = d
Object distance for the Eyepiece, which is the distance of the Image formed by the Objective and the Eyepiece = d – v
Image distance for the Eyepiece = v’
Magnification for the Eyepiece
Me = - v’/ (d – v)
Given in the Question:
Mo = Me
-v/ u = - v’/(d – v)
v/ u = v’/(d – v)
v d – v^2 = u v’
v’ = (v d – v^2)/ u
Overall magnification:
M = - v’/ u = (- v d + v^2)/ u^2
M = (- v d/ u^2) + (v^2/ u^2)
Because A gave an overall magnification MA that was greater than that given by B, MB, it could only be because M is given by:
M = (- v d/u^2) + (v^2/u^2),
Therefore
MA = (v^2/u^2) – (v d A/ u^2)
And,
MB = (v^2/u^2) – (v d B/u^2)
If,
MA > MB
(v^2/u^2) – (v d A/u^2) > (v^2/u^2) – (v d B/u^2)
(v d A/u^2) > (v d B/u^2)
dA > dB
That is, Choice A: The distance between objective and eyepiece in A, dA is greater than the corresponding distance in B, dB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kim.dangal6935
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:02 pm Post subject: Hmmm. |
|
|
Is it simple mathematics?
Ma = -ia/0a
Mb = -ib/0b
Since Ma > Mb then Mb has to be more negative.
For Mb to be more negative in value, 0b < Oa.
So that means "the distance between the objective and the eyepiece in A is greater than the distance between the objective and eyepiece in B"
Right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
klaw19867026
Joined: 19 Jul 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used the previous post's reasoning also, however I got a different conclusion. If we want magnification of A to be larger, then don't we decrease Oa so that the magnitude of magnification is larger?
Ma = -ia/0a
Mb = -ib/0b
so having 0a < Ob will make A's magnification larger. Decreasing the distance between then two lenses should have this effect, so wouldn't this make choice B true? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
btdumford5156
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:03 pm Post subject: WOW! |
|
|
| Can someone please explain this question? I choose B, Because it seemed intuitively more accurate, but I now see that im incorrect, please help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sanji2896161
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:24 pm Post subject: Re: WOW! |
|
|
| btdumford5156 wrote: | | Can someone please explain this question? I choose B, Because it seemed intuitively more accurate, but I now see that im incorrect, please help! |
it's a matter of sign, Magnification for objective lens is positive, magnification for eyepiece is negative. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffreyt.y8164
Joined: 25 Aug 2011 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks jellywing_2058! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|