| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
davidjauer8114
Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: Question 31 |
|
|
Hi
#31
I have been looking over the answers and I do not see why the answer for #31 is A, that the films were effective in eliciting emotional responses.
Why is the answer not B, "although visually ambitious, the films were too confusing." The author makes point to say how confusing the films are.
Thanks for your help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
priya.bork7031
Joined: 20 Dec 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, i dunno if this is still helpful to you:
#31
When I was debating btwn the two answer choices the word "too" got me. When you say something is "too confusing" it has a negative connotation to it. The author doesn't have a negative view on avant-garde films, but just characterizes it as confusing, and, furthermore, it is meant to be so. On the other other, being confused or put in discomfort is an emotional response which is what they are going for, so A was more appropriate to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bump |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|