| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rao.mudigo8389
Joined: 21 Jun 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:00 pm Post subject: GS-2 Physical Sciences Question 4 |
|
|
A.) I dont get why its a DIVERGING LENS (roman numeral III) and not a convergin lens....
formula-wise
diverging: f <0, di<0>0 and di>0
(by di, i mean distance of image)
so
1.) Converging:
1/f = 1/o + 1/i ; if o =f, then 1/f - 1/f = 1/i = not possible to view image
BUT
2.) Diverging:
-1/f = 1/o - 1/i; if o=f, then -1/f -1/f = 1/i = a possible number for i
I get the point that virtual images are only produced via a diverging lens, but mathematically a calculation isnt possible when I, II, and IV are applied as opposed to I, II, and III... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kim.dangal6935
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: yes |
|
|
| I agree with you. I'm confused as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kim.dangal6935
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: actually |
|
|
actually, IV doesn't make sense.
What does it mean by using the Diverging Lens as the "objective". Isn't the objective defined as the object? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kms36196101
Joined: 24 Dec 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am confused too. This question doesnt make any sense at all. Can any of the makers of this test explain???? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|