| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 2176
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:14 am Post subject: GS-2 Physical Sciences Question 49 |
|
|
| Be the first to start a discussion about this question! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sbains3528
Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
can someone explain this more clearly??
Which of the species in Table 1 is best suited to oxidize NO given that:
HNO2 + H+ + e- ↔ NO + H2O
Eo = +1.00 V
ANSWER: The more positive the Eo value, the greater the tendency for that half-reaction to proceed to the right. Since the Eo value for the Ce4+/Ce3+ equilibrium system is more positive than that for the HNO2/NO equilibrium system, the latter will be shifted to the left, that is, NO will be oxidized (= lose electrons; recall LEO is a GERC!; CHM 10.2). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lrasja505901
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
HNO2 gets reduced to NO E= +1.000
CE4+ gets reduced to CE3+ E= +1.695
CE4+ gets reduced. It is an oxidizing agent.
There it can oxidize NO. Only if it results in the reaction with an E greater than that of the initial rx.
1.6>1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lrasja505901
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
you were probably like me...
I thought Cd with its negative reduction potential was the best choice. That only means Cd tends to be oxidized. Not that it will oxidize something else..When looking to oxidize another species...we need an oxidizing agent, aka something that gets reduced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|