MCAT


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Question 40

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mcat-prep.com Forum Index -> GS-5 Physical Sciences
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pinoalejan6739



Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:01 am    Post subject: Re: Question 40 Reply with quote

i dont understand this question at all!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bearsfan544772



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I'm reading the explanation correctly, we are looking for values that are less positive or more negative than than the reduction of Iron (III) to Iron (II). I count 3 ... at values of +1.00, +1.33, and -0.91

Why is the -0.91 value omitted?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j5devries4378



Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:11 pm    Post subject: My method of solving... Get back to me Reply with quote

Since a positive Ecell represents spontaneous, and
Ecell= E(cath)-E(anode), must be positive. Since the reduction happens at the cathode, and we know the RedPotential is +.77V, you have
Ecell = (.77V) - E(anode) = positive.

Since the question asks for which ones could NOT reduce the Iron, you want a negative cell potential. I reversed the cell potentials for all of the reactions since they are being oxidized, instead of reduced like the table shows. (ie Zn -> Zn2+ + 2e). However, this gave me the opposite result of what I expected.

When I plug the values in, in the UNREVERSED way, as they are in the table, the question works out.

For example:
Ecell = (+.77V) - (+1.00) = -(.23). I just don't know why the values in the table would not be reversed.
Can anyone explain this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j5devries4378



Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, a more positive cell potential means they are more easily reduced (better oxidizing agent). Just look for the more positive cell potentials. That is the answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DLBMCAT



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The above explanation still does not make any sense to me, can someone elaborate?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
serafin8506737



Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:13 pm    Post subject: re Reply with quote

redox reaction pair if Fe is being reduced something needs to get oxidized. Anyways to cut to the chase high positive values for E are spontaneous,high positive values also indicate that the product is a great OXIDIZING AGENT. Species with really negative values for E are non spontaneous, so their reactants are great REDUCING AGENTS. If you toy around with all the values and flip the signs so that the end product will be positive (spontaneous) you can see that 1.00 V and 1.33 when turned negative and added to .77 (which needs to be positive because its a reduction and thats what youre looking for) in the half reaction will always yield a negative value and thus make it non spontaneous and impossible to reduce

learned this in princeton review hope it helps
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    mcat-prep.com Forum Index -> GS-5 Physical Sciences All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO