| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
drgshahbaz1193
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 4:19 pm Post subject: Resolving forces |
|
|
WIth the resolving forces problems where we have objects suspended by ropes I have a question about weigth and tension. In the problem where there is a object M and it is sitting on a surface and connected by a rope on a pulley system to a smaller object m that is dandling. In resolving the forces the tension is equal to the weight, so how does the object m fall lower? ALso if the force of the object downward is counteracted by the tension then where does the tension felt near object M come from?
I know this is a really silly question but it has been a while since I took general physics and I am a little confused. Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcat_premed3832
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | In resolving the forces the tension is equal to the weight, so how does the object m fall lower? ALso if the force of the object downward is counteracted by the tension then where does the tension felt near object M come from? |
The 2 questions are, of course, related.
Object m falls because object M has no friction.
When you resolve the forces around M, you get the force of tension T to the right (caused by mg) and you get no counteracting force to the left (which would be, normally, friction). If there is no friction, then mass m could be as small as an atom and mass M can be as big as an elephant, as long as the rest of the data is typical first year imaginary estimates (weightless cord and frictionless pulley) then not only does the elephant move to the right, it must accelerate to the rate because of the tiny T. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|